Viewing entries tagged
health

Book Review

Hi there.

From time to time I am asked to review books. I finally had a chance to read one that was sent to me, and I am happy to report it is a great book.

The title: "Weight Loss Surgery--The Real Skinny" by Nick Nicholson, MD and BA Blackwood.

The book is all about the various types of weight loss surgeries and their merits. It is an easy read, very understandable to medical and non-medical readers and well written. What I liked most about it was the focus on the psychology of weight loss. The author gives many example of treatment failures as well as the successes.

Oftentimes when you read books like this, it is simply an advertisement of their product. However, Dr. Nicholson is giving extremely good advice, going so far as to let prospective patients know that you need to be psychologically ready to have a successful outcome. That surgery is not a panacea, and you should not rush into it.

So if you are thinking about having or recommending weight loss surgery, you should read this book first.

Best,
ilene

PS here's the link for the kindle version which is on sale right now http://www.amazon.com/Weight-Loss-Surgery-Real-Skinny-ebook/dp/B00GTYYVS8/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1402353197&sr=1-1&keywords=weight+loss+surgery+the+real+skinny

My Own Radio Show!

Apparently, the response to my radio interviews have been very positive, and I have been asked to do my own show. I call it "Healthy World with Dr. B"

I recorded my first episode last night, and you can hear the hour-long show by clicking here: Radio Show with Donna Pinter.  (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/alternativepublicradiointernational/2014/05/01/healthy-world-with-dr-b-interview-with-visionary-artist-donna-pinter)

Donna Pinter is a visionary artist, world renown for her Neiman Marcus pottery line, ballerina and koi paintings, and now mosaic murals. She is also a Reiki Master and has an interesting perspective on this alternative form of healing that works with modern medicine, not in lieu of it.

Let me know what you think.

Drowning in Paperwork

First what I mean by paperwork is documentation. This can be through an electronic record, dictation, or good old-fashioned tree pulp derived paper.

Think your doctor doesn't spend enough time with you? Think it is because they are greedy and trying to see too much in too short a time? How about this as a reason - It is because physicians are drowning in required paperwork and have to jump through pre-authorization hoops by insurers. As an ER doc, I thankfully don't have to do the latter, but I spend about 2 hours of my 12 hour shift dictating. Until my throat is sore - especially when you see 30 patients and have to dictate on all of them.

First, check out this article "Physicians Spend 3 Weeks per Year on Insurer Paperwork." What was even more shocking was that Nursing staff spent more than 23 weeks per physician per year, and clerical staff spent 44 weeks per physician per year, interacting with health plans. There are 52 weeks in a year, and while I understand clerical staff doing administrative work, nurses spend HALF of their time doing non-nursing work. Wow.

And this costs 31 billion dollars each year. I'll say this again, non-medical-care administrative time costs 31 billion dollars a year. In health care insurance-speak, that means 8 million more people could have had good health insurance (at $5K/year).

If I did not have to dictate, I could see six more patients per shift, or spend more time with the ones I have. Conversely, I recognize the need for good documentation for the benefit of the patient; not to mention for medicolegal reasons.

I remember I did an administrative month in my medical training, where I sat in on a meeting where they were discussing "How to increase nurse satisfaction" as morale was low. They put boxes around the ER asking for suggestions. In the same breath they talked about how they needed something tracked and said the nurses should do it and would now make the nurses fill out ANOTHER form as part of the discharge process. I raised my hand and suggested that if they want to increase morale, tell the nurses they have to fill out one less form; not give them one more. Needless to say, nobody "got it" and continued with their plans.

Healthcare providers went into the profession (for the most part) to deliver healthcare. But increasingly, we do so much that has nothing to do with providing healthcare. Which is why many physicians are going to all-cash practices - without insurance plans (includes Medicare/Medicaid) hassles to deal with, they can spend more time with more patients at a lower cost to patients.

Some suggestions include single-payer systems, as one payer means less bureaucracies to maneuver through. Whatever the system, politicians need to acknowledge that if they want higher quality care, they need to pay physicians for providing care, and minimize administrative duties for them and their staff (less staff would cost less too).

Regarding documentation, computerization has offered a solution that has pros and cons. I have used a few history/physical and order entry systems and have found, for me - a computer literate 75wpm typer - it saves time and is more legible. Many systems are overly complex and take too long for simple documentation i.e. it should not take 10 minutes to document an ankle fracture. I like these systems where I take a laptop in the room and document while in the room, order tests in the room, and before I leave, the nurses/techs are already there initiating my orders. I have to document and order stuff, why not do it in front of the patient where they can get more face-time and it doesn't interfere with the flow of the physician-patient interaction?

However, there are a number of problems: 1) Laptops used everyday have degradation of battery life and don't last more than a few hours, to say nothing of a whole shift. 2) Physicians who are not as computer literate will find the process frustrating as it takes longer for them to document. 3) Templates do not have good medicolegal documentation and make a poor narrative. 4) Free-form typing takes a long time, even with macro use. 5) Actually uses more paper than a paper system. 6) Major issues when computers are "down."

We have a number of hurdles to getting higher quality, higher efficiency, lower cost health care. Administrative costs are one of them.

Mental Health Break

Geno's World: Video: How to make homemade ice cream in a plastic bag. This has nothing to do with the topic, but I thought it interesting, and doable. Now back from your break, we have important work to do!

In the midst of my health care reform blog, I'm taking a mental health break to address the broken mental health system. In the 1981 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA), federal funding for community mental health centers and other mental health and substance abuse services was eliminated. It was replaced by a block grant to the states that cut funding by 21% and made mental health facilities dependent on private funding to make ends meet. Thus the mental health safety net began to collapse. Looking at the STATISTICS, the number of psychiatric beds decreased by more than half, from 524,878 in 1970 to 211,199 in 2002, the corresponding bed rates per 100,000 civilian population dropped from 264 to 73, and beds in State mental hospitals (the ones that will treat you if you are uninsured) accounted for most of this precipitous drop, with their number representing only 27 percent of all psychiatric beds in 2002, compared with almost 80 percent in 1970.

And it is a huge problem. Nearly every day I have a patient declaring they are suicidal and need legally required treatment and evaluation by a psychiatrist. But they are waiting longer and longer to find a psychiatric bed at a psych hospital. It is not uncommon for patients to wait 16 hours in the emergency department, though the other day, I had a patient wait 41 hours. This sucks up a needed ER bed, nursing staff, doctor attention.

And when I brought this to the attention of the hospital administrator their response was, "Oh, we've had patients wait longer than that." I tried to impress him with the fact that more patients were LWBS (left without being seen) as a result of the longer wait times from the psych patients (there were 2 there that night, in an ER that has 9 beds) occupying 2 beds for a combined 56 hours. He was unmoved, though my exasperation did garner the response "I'll look into it."

The public funding cuts and closure of mental hospitals is compounded by a large uninsured population that is growing by the day. If you are insured and suicidal, you can find a bed. If you are uninsured, you wait, and wait, and wait. They are not the only ones who suffer. The patients not seen in the waiting room suffer as well. But the law says suicidal patients insured or not, must be seen by a psychiatrist before discharge from the ER. The law does not seem to account for the lack of mental health coverage though.

The laws either need to be changed, or else a complete reworking and expansion of our public mental health system needs to be accomplished as part of health care reform. That will probably mean going back to federal funding of mental health community centers as we did in the 1960s and 1970s. The block grant system isn't working. This is not a small problem. It is a big problem. One that has been ignored for far too long. Looks like we need to go back to the future to fix our problems.

What is "Value-based" health insurance coverage?

I read this the other day:

Sen. Hutchinson touts value-based healthcare insurance coverage. In an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle (5/28), Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX) wrote that rising healthcare costs "threaten the competitiveness of businesses in Texas and across the country and place an added burden on families who are struggling to make ends meet. Furthermore, our state and the federal government cannot indefinitely sustain the soaring cost of entitlement programs, like Medicare and Medicaid, which have helped ensure low-income and elderly Americans receive care...One of the most promising new concepts in health care delivery is Value Based Insurance Design, which offers the potential to simultaneously improve health care quality while reducing costs." This concept "embraces the simple yet transformative idea that cost barriers should be removed for 'high-value' prescriptions and treatments. A medicine or procedure is deemed high-value when evidence shows that we can maximize the health benefits to patients compared to dollars spent."



Why is this "transformative?" I've always wondered why treatments weren't covered for necessary medicines etc...that would keep people healthy and out of the hospital (which costs a lot more). Hepatitis vaccine isn't covered, but hepatitis treatment is. Stuff like that. So "value-based" healthcare basically says that a medicine or procedure has a huge benefit relative to dollars spent.


While I agree this should be done, I ask, why is this idea transformative? It is simple common sense. I guess not so common in the political arena.


Of course, I have noted potential for problems in the wording. What do they mean by "maximize?" I would use the definition: The value of a procedure or medicine is maximal if were that done, a higher cost medicine or procedure or admission to hospital will no longer be required.


Of course, that is what I would do. I would not put it past congress to do something completely different and render this good idea useless.

How to choose a hospital PART 2

I have some additions and clarifications to my previous post.

To the above tips I add:

7) Find out which hospital closest to you has 24 hour cardiac catheterization capabilities. If you have a heart attack, you do not want to go to a hospital that is going to have to transfer you for this critical life-saving procedure. Time is muscle!

8) Pick a hospital with a pre-code team. What is a pre-code team? Usually when a patient "codes" i.e. heart stops or stops breathing, or both, a "code blue" is called where all available physicians who are part of the responding code team converge on the patient, with nurses, and respiratory therapists as part of the team (in many hospitals this is simply the ER doc running like a mad-man or mad-woman to the code). A pre-code team assess patients that are getting sicker BEFORE they code. And prevents them from coding in the first place. Not many hospitals have this. I would select one that does.

Clarifications:

When asking if a there are hospitalists, you need to specify, "Do you have hospitalist in-hospital at night?" (some hospitalists take call from home - odd, I know, but that's why you need to specify).

While academic centers have residents taking care of you at night, you might be wary, but compared to not having anyone there at night, it is preferable. Though I would ideally want a hospital with intensivists (ICU specialists that are there 24 hours) and a pre-code team. And second to that would be having hospitalists overnight. An Academic center would be my third choice. In certain situations, academic centers may be superior - especially for unusual diseases, transplants, and state-of-the-art medical care.

**note**
I would like to thank minako for her suggestion for #7 above. An obvious omission on my part, I'm sure it will not be the last. I welcome your comments and suggestions.